Article:		Trees, Temporarily
Subject:		XPath isn't guilty
Date:		2003-12-04 06:04:57
From:		Oleg Tkachenko
"XPath 1.0 has a special data type called Result Tree Fragments" is certanly a typo. Should be read as "XSLT 1.0 has a special data type called Result Tree Fragments"

Previous Message

Next Message

• XPath isn't guilty
  2003-12-04 07:32:34 Bob DuCharme [Reply]
  
  You're right, my mistake. http://www.w3.org/TR/xslt#section-Result-Tree-Fragments makes it clear that XSLT adds this "data type" to the four defined in XPath that it can already use.

  
  Bob
  
  

• XPath isn't guilty
  2003-12-04 07:30:34 Bob DuCharme [Reply]
  
  You're right, my mistake. http://www.w3.org/TR/xslt#section-Result-Tree-Fragments makes it clear that XSLT adds this "data type" to the four defined in XPath that it can already use.

  
  Bob